Grant Morrison’s Batman Incorporated and the New 52 [SPOILERS]
Michael Moccio ’16 / Emertainment Monthly Editor
Like every other avid comic book reader, I eagerly anticipate each Wednesday when new issues come out. Scott Snyder’s “Death of the Family” storyline ended in the recent weeks; the first “fallout” issues dealing with its aftermath came out just last week. This week, instead of dealing with the aftermath of “Death of the Family”, DC Comics published Batman Incorporated #8, which deals with another storyline entirely. Bruce’s former lover launches an all-out assault on Batman and Robin, putting Robin—Damian Wayne—in mortal danger. As a lover of DC Comics, I can say without hesitation that Batman will always have a special place in my heart, but Batman Incorporated #8 represents everything wrong in The New 52. Today, February 27th 2013, Damian Wayne has been killed.
This issue marks the climax of writer Grant Morrison’s run on Batman Incorporated. Morrison has written stories of critical acclaim, including Arkham Asylum: A Serious House on Serious Earth, Batman: RIP, and Final Crises However, these great stories are now marred by the travesty that is Batman Incorporated. Marred with a convoluted death, terrible pacing, and the musings of an abusive writer, Batman titles will never be the same after this issue. In “Death in the Family” readers saw how hard Batman ran with every fiber of his being to save Jason; we get none of that in Batman Incorporated—the two-page spread in which Batman comes out of the water and rushes off panel gives no climatic experience. Moreover, in Robin’s fight scene, which was essentially about a page and a half, we got no indications of heroism, and instead only receive a scared, out of character, little boy who got gutted by a sword.
With Damian dead, younger readers have been alienated. Robin was initially introduced to the Batman mythos in April of 1940 to attract younger readers by creating a character they could identify with. Back then, Robin was Dick Grayson. Very few of us today can relate to Grayson now, since most of us don’t have dead or absent parents; moreover, Grayson has grown up and taken his own mantle as Nightwing, separate from Batman, which furthers him even more from that demographic. Almost no one related to Jason Todd back when he was introduced as the second Robin, which was one of the main reasons editors considered his fate—he was killed and resurrected and is now an anti-hero. Tim Drake in The New 52 isn’t relatable to anyone because he’s perfect; whereas pre-52 Drake only had his intelligence to rely on, New 52 Drake is not only smart, but also athletic, acrobatic, and militant. No one can relate to someone like that, which was why Damian Wayne as Robin was a refreshing take on the Robin identity.
He is the perfect embodiment of the kids in America today. Both of his working parents are always gone—Bruce plays Batman and Talia Al Ghul heads the League of Assassins while holding her father hostage. Separated or not, Damian’s parents have neglected him, just like what has sadly become more common for kids in our world due to the working economy. Damian’s had to fend for himself and deal with his own issues while in pursuit of his parents’ acceptance and time—he gets neither. Damian continually shows his endearing child-like nature in his compulsive need to impress his Father in a misguided attempt to make Bruce proud, all the while having been manipulated by his mother. Through his past, Damian has become one of the most three-dimensional characters in current comic book literature.
In an exclusive with The New York Post, Morrison said, “Robin’s death will illustrate how parents lose sight of their kids when they fight.” Morrison believes that he’s creating an allegory for domestic turbulence; however, he misuses his powers as a writer by inserting himself into the story and fundamentally changing the cores of some of the characters. Morrison “threw in elements of his own parents’ divorce” which colored Talia Al Ghul’s character. Pre-52, she legitimately cared about her son, now, however, she sees him only as expendable. This contradicts Peter Tomasi’s own interpretation of Talia’s character in the New 52; Tomasi is the writer of Batman and Robin where Talia’s relationship with Damian takes the most precedence. Morrison completely changed her to suit his own needs. He needed Talia to move away from her maternal qualities to justify her actions towards Damian. This makes the reader lose all faith in Talia as a mother, which turns the reader completely against her. Although this may be what Morrison wants, her actions go against the fundamental core of her character. There is no redemption for Talia, there is no remorse. Her tears and “moment of weakness” at the end of Batman Incorporated #8 are out of character with Morrison’s initial out of character portrayal of her character in his own book. Taking her core apart was a blatant misuse of his powers as an author. In comic books, writers share the mythos and the universe—where one author establishes qualities of a character or creates events, these actions spill over into the other titles. Morrison changed not only Talia’s, but also Damian Wayne’s, character without justification or character development. It’s that lack of consideration that makes Morrison’s actions seem to be an abuse of power, because he didn’t take the time to develop the characters to where he wanted them to be.
Damian Wayne was initially an emotional boy behind a mask generated by countless years of Spartan-like training under his mother. Morrison adds an uncharacteristic amount of whimsy to Damian’s character throughout the course of his run. Take, for example, in Batman Incorporated #1, Damian saves a cow from a butcher shop and declares it “Bat Cow” and that he will now be a vegetarian. As amusing as this initially was, it’s so uncharacteristically Damian, it’s frustrating. Moreover, Morrison has continued a storyline from Pre-52 and integrated it into the New 52, and effectively took control of Damian’s character; however Tomasi, should have precedent over how Damian’s character should be. Because of that, Morrison warped Damian into what he wanted, rather than taken the New 52 Damian for what he was; Morrison essentially brought over his Damian into a world where Damian should have been controlled by Tomasi. However, nothing has infuriated me more, than when Damian died, because Morrison completely took him out of character. Damian is no longer a clever, intellectual boy, skilled in tactics as shown in Batman and Son and Batman and Robin (2009), both of which were written by Morrison himself. Morrison reduced him to a naïve, child-like character. In reality, through his training as both an assassin and Robin, one would think Damian should have had more sense than to attack an opponent who’s both physically larger and is potentially as or more skilled head on in front of about fifteen snipers. No one would do that. In his last moments, Damian does not exert any control, use any tactics, or exemplify any of the many skills he’s accumulated over his career. Morrison’s definition of a “heroic death” does not fit the standards of what the general public would consider it to be.
Although Damian was Morrison’s creation, and was initially going to be used as a plot point in the non-canonical Batman and Son, Damian has grown far and above his initial use as a plot device. In a 2006 article on Newsarama, Morrison said, “I’d originally planned a heartbreaking death scene for the Damian character in [Batman and Son]. He was to save Batman’s life then perish in what was a really nice and emotional conclusion…then I started writing the character and realized he was too good to waste.” Morrison himself recognized that Damian was “too good to waste,” but Damian is so much more than those four words. Over the course of the series, Damian has evolved from a ruthless child-assassin to a voice of reason for Dick Grayson (Nightwing #17), an anchoring point for Jason Todd (Red Hood and the Outlwaws #17), a rival for Tim Drake, and a beacon of light for his father (Batman and Robin #17). Damian is one of the most pivotal characters in all of The New 52 and Morrison’s decision to kill Damian spits in not only our faces as readers, but also in the faces of the other writers of the New 52.
Scott Snyder recently wrapped up “Death of the Family”, a story arc where the Joker launched a full on assault on the Bat Family. There had been hints that someone was going to die and based on the ending of Batman #17, I thought the worst was over when the Joker died. But that was not the case. Morrison wanted to highlight culpability and give his characters room to grow from loss, but that could have easily been done with the death of Alfred in “Death of the Family”. Both Alfred, who’s a father figure to Bruce and the rest of the Family, and Damian are lights for Batman’s moral compass. Alfred represents the old while Damian represents the new. I don’t understand why Morrison wouldn’t want to kill Alfred, so that Damian would become the main anchor for Bruce and look towards the future, rather than kill Bruce’s legacy and son—his literal future. Morrison’s actions symbolize a giant “two-steps” back for the entire New 52. Damian’s death, for all intents and purposes, is senseless. Did Morrison really bring back Damian into the New 52 only to kill him off before his prime? No reason, both from a literary and reader’s perspective, justifies the killing of this ten year old boy, who hasn’t even seen his first year as Robin in this new universe.
Regardless of what I think should have happened in the plots of these Batman titles, there has clearly been some miscommunication happening all throughout the New 52. In Teen Titans #0, Tim Drake’s past is contradictory—one writer had him start off as Robin and another had him start off as Red Robin. More recently, in Red Hood and the Outlaws #17, Jason Todd talks to Damian in reflection on some of the events that happened in previous issues of Batman Incorporated, specifically how they fought together as Wingman and Redbird. This brings the legitimacy of Batman Incorporated into question, because it doesn’t make sense for Damian to die, if he was out and about in Gotham while his mother had a hit on him. If Damian had to deal with both the Joker and his mother simultaneously, then I could understand his death because no one could deal with that; however, because specific events in Batman Incorporated are referred to during a post-“Death of the Family” issue, the reader doesn’t know when these events have actually taken place. It’s these kinds of idiosyncrasies that frustrate me, because they could have easily been avoided with just a touch of communication between the writers.
Past all of this, however, Morrison’s decisions are in the wrong when looking at them through the lens of “Death of the Family”. With Damian’s death, everything that happened in “Death of the Family” has been negated. The Joker’s goal was to split the family apart to bring Batman back to his prime. Morrison is a large proponent of the “Batgod” Theory, in which he believes that Batman can overcome any situation because he’ll be at least five steps ahead of everyone else; from surviving hell both physical and mentally in Arkham Asylum and literally standing up to the embodiment of evil in Final Crises. By killing Damian, Morrison has effectively become the Joker. He’s killed off one of the main lynchpins of the Bat Family in an effort to put Batman back on his pedestal where he belongs; this is another example of how Morrison abuses his powers as an author by not taking into consideration what Batman has become. Instead, Morrison only focuses on what he wants Batman to be.
Morrison still has four more issues until his run on Batman Incorporated is done. Hopefully, this death is just a ruse and Damian will be back with us by the end, but I cannot stress enough how much of a mistake it would be for Damian to stay dead. Nor can I stress enough how much of a mistake it would be for Damian to stay dead under the current circumstances. Because of his blatant out-of-character qualities, one can theorize that perhaps Damian has faked his death in an attempt to make his parents see reason. However, I’m very skeptical about this logical deduction, simply because the illustrator of Batman Incorporated said in a Newsarama article that, “Damian Wayne is as dead as Thomas and Martha.”
The fans are currently in uproar that Damian has been murdered—not only by Talia, but by Morrison himself. Recently, DC Comics has added a two-page news cast at the end of every issue and changes each week. The ending to this week’s was, “Robin is dead. Repeat. Robin is dead. I’m… I’m sorry… Please excuse me,” as tears begin to well in the reporters eyes. This portrayal of someone separate from the DC Universe, which serves as a mirror of ourselves as readers, effectively conveys the feelings we’re experiencing over the loss of our little soldier boy. Some may claim that life is not fair, that we shouldn’t expect anything different because Damian’s death is not fair—but as many, many people also like to point out: comic books are not real life. It’s in the pages of these epics that hardships are experienced, but not out of randomness or purposelessness like in life; everything happens for a reason in all literature. Hopefully, the reason for Damian’s death will become clear in the subsequent issues, but at the moment, all we can do is grieve and keep the Boy Wonder close to our hearts.
*This article does not represent the opinions of Emertainment Monthly, just of the reviewer themselves. *
[polldaddy poll=6927308]
I can actually explain the Batman Inc thing. Apparently contrary to everyone else in the New52, Batman had been working long before everyone else- Red Robin can also be called Robin technically. Inc is in continuity in the new books but not initially, only right around issue 3. Inc takes place behind other books- keep in mind all batman stories like DOTF and NOTO take place in one night or a week with days in between. In Batman and robin 9 night of the owls he is targeted by his mothers assassins- the hit had been out for a long time, and he faces another member during DOTF. But I agree he grew out of his original reason of existence. He will be missed, man.
I’m not going to knock Morrison’s writing simple because of this run of Batman, Inc. But honestly, him killing Damian was a mistake. Yes, he created the character and planned to kill him early, but he kept him and by keeping him eventually the character grew out of his hands. Damian became something else, whether you hate him or not. He became something important to Batman, he became a parameter of which all of Bruce’s decisions are based off of. To play the overprotective father to *really* show how far Batman was willing to go for his Robin, just like the old days when Dick used to get captured and Batman had to rescue him. Bruce really pushed to protect him, got BETTER to save him. He was willing to do things he believed he wouldn’t ever do to save his son, because it was his blood.
Batman changed because of him, and just because people hate Damian, I can’t hate the change. Just because people want the darker, more grim Batman again, and I will admit I’d love to see it, I can’t really go along with killing Damian for it. Because, honestly no new Robin, NO ONE, is going to really calm him down. This will be worse than Todd, which will have been a mistake. This will be all on Bruce’s hands, and that’s going to bother him for the rest of his life, more than Todd, more than any other mistake. And to replace Damian, I can’t see it happening, no matter how good Harper is. It’s just wrong, giving him a new Robin after this. Batman is better off being alone on this point, and the entire concept of Robin being thrown out for a long while. How can he trust anyone again, when the woman he loved would so tear out his heart?
I liked Damian, especially Gleason’s run of him and I will miss him. But the death was bullshit and completely didn’t make sense to the character. Cause honestly what character with League and Robin Training is going to take on a superior opponent head on with no real strategy around an entire upper level of snipers? That’s completely ludicrous from someone who has been train in tactics since birth practically. Sure someone will say he naively believed his mother would care, but that’s not it. He knew what she was capable of, and he knew that she could probably kill him, if she could just so easily of replaced him, as shown in Pre-52 BR(I think might have been just Batman). There was a lot wrong with the writing in terms of plot-holes and things that didn’t make sense. But we’ll see how this all turns out, we may have lost a son, but we’ve definitely just gained a Devil.
Damian was originally going to be killed off in the first arc of his appearance but editorial decisions kept him going for another 7 years. I wish Damian hadn’t been killed either but Morrison gave him a heart wrenching, fight to the finish end that befitted the character so well. Seeing him come back would be to spit in the face of comic book death which I dislike more than Damian getting killed. RIP Damian you’ll be missed.
I wouldn’t have even minded it as much if it was done as part of the DOTF story arc. But to do it in another trade, directly after DOTF concluded….what the actual fuck? What’s the reason? To alienate readers, more importantly, the new readers who came aboard during DOTF? Stupid.
Morrison created Damian, so Morrison has the right to take him away.
Morrison has this tendency of making characters, letting other writers make them GREAT, and then making a mockery of what they became by doing shit like this. Yes, he CREATED the character, but the character wasn’t actually HIS–Damian belonged to all who wrote for him; creating him doesn’t count after he’s grown and changed and left his hands, there’s no reason for it.
So, no, he had no right to kill him off and especially not in that way, it was senseless and purely to sell more issues, NOT for the sake of the story.
I HATE IT!!!!!!!
WHY GRANT KILLED DAMIAN?!?!?
BECAUSE BATS INC WASNT GOOD ENOUGH???
MORRISON HAS DESTROYED ALL THE REST OF THE STORIES IN THE BATMAN’S WORLD!!!
WHAT ABOUT BATMAN AND ROBIN??
DID HE CARED A LITTLE BIT ABOUT THE OTHER WRITERS??? NOOOOO!!!!!! NEVER!!!! THAT’S WAS SO SELFISH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I HATE YOU, GRANT MORRISON!!!!!! F#CK YOU!!!
fuck it! i love Damian he’s the greatest robin and i never liked all other robin except robin John Blake
With Dr Hurt first masquerading as an alive Thomas Wayne, then the reveal of Damian as Bruce’s son, then Bruce’s “death” and return, Morrison’s entire run has used Father/Son and Life/Death dynamics throughout.
Damian was such an interesting character Morrison created that Morrison’s story could not be finished within the confines of the “old-52” and carried over to include these 12 issues of Batman Incorporated. As we’ve all enjoyed Damian in the New52 Batman & Robin, let’s not forget the Old52 B&R was created for Morrison to tell the story of the Dick/Damian dynamic duo.
The heartburn over the timing of Damian’s death in such proximity to the “Death Of The Family” doesn’t take into account the fact that Snyder obviously realized that DOTFam couldn’t carry as much suspense if Damian were already gone.
I think we should thank Morrison for creating a character that we all obviously enjoyed, other writers enjoyed, and whose demise will be mourned by many. And unlike Jason Todd, whose demise was mourned by Bruce alone, and whose return was a source of mockery, Damian’s potential return will only make sense as the grandson of Ra’s Al Ghul and son of Bruce Wayne.
I hope Grant Morrison never touches the Batman franchise again!